Thursday, February 21, 2013

Is the Great Commission About Evangelism or "Making Disciples?"

The passage known as the great commission states:    Matt: 19-20 "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit,  teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”   We often hear we are to be "evangelistic."  In the common parlance of Christians born when most had modern world-view, this translated into the need for one of two things: 1) Sending missionaries overseas or 2) Locally, to be conducting "home bible studies".   In both cases the emphasis was on getting those that heard to obey the five steps of "The Plan of Salvation." Evangelism essentially consisted of getting others to accept our particular brand of Christianity.  This  was though  accepting what we believed to be the organization and worship practices of the first century church.  Though many aspects of the Restoration Movement were indeed laudable,  I wonder if in this process we might have missed the mark of the imperatives in the Great Commission.

For example, the word translated from the Greek for "evangelist" means one who announces good news.  Our good news was to center on Christ.  As one who taught "Home Bible Studies", I know the charts we used focused on the establishment of the church at Pentecost.  The charts before Pentecost predicted this event.  The charts after  Pentecost focused on organization and worship of the church.  My wife and I created a separate chart on the life of Christ because none existed.  Hence, in the 1950-1970's the emphasis in evangelism seemed to be on "church".  But, doesn't this miss the point of the good news of the Story of Redemption embodied in Christ life, death, and resurrection?

I would suggest that this was a grievous error which missed the point of making disciples.  It was further hindered and compounded by the approach used.  Note the Great Commission says we are to "make disciples" and "teach them to observe all I have commanded you."  If the emphasis was on the "five steps" and church ecclesiology where does that leave "making disciples?"  What does it mean to be a "disciple?" It certainly means to be a follower.  Here the embodiment  of this idea is entirely in the person of Jesus.  This means we must determine how to be Christ-like and teach others to do so.  It means Christ's mission in the world must be our mission.  To do this we must do the things that Christ did in the way that He did with the attitude that He had.  Of course as mere humans we cannot possibly live up to this.  But, thanks for his Grace, we don't have to worry.  I would suggest being Christ-like has little to do with our previous emphasis on church organization and particular traditional rules for "doing church".  We should instead be "doing Christ".
+

Monday, February 18, 2013

A Leadership Vignette


When I began my engineering career, I was hired by Sperry Phoenix, in Phoenix, Ariz.  My first job was as the project engineer for the UHF radio transceiver that went to the moon in the Apollo Moon program.  Since I wanted to do circuit design, this was a new engineer’s dream.   My future objective was to move into management.  According my wife and I moved to Richardson, Texas, where I took a job as a systems engineer for Collins Radio Co.  My task was related to the design, analysis and testing of the earth stations for first Intellsat synchronous communications satellites that were launched. I was on my way to management as I was designated the acting program manager in the plant when the designated program manager was on site in Moree, Australia 
Wishing to complete advanced degrees, I shortly decided to attend Southern Methodist University.  Even though I had obtained a teaching assistant position and was going to take a leave of absence, my Division Director offered me a better deal.  He put me on one half time, continued by benefits, and paid for my advanced degree 100%.  However, even before being totally finished (which I did), I was put in charge of a group of PhD’s in my 20’s.  By this time, I had discovered that most problems were not technical or even fiscal in nature; they were all related to people.  Thus began intense investigation of leadership as well as courses in motivation, goal setting, and group dynamics.
My wife and I both have country in our hearts.  There was a separate “town” nearby encircled by Richardson.  It consisted of about 152 acres with a population of 102 in 1990.  Each of the lots in this town had two acres.  It was less than 10 minutes from the Collin Radio facility.  There were no restrictions on animals or gardens.  So, we jumped at the chance to purchase an older home there (they were all old).  At last, some land was ours.
Our backyard consisted of an area separated from our neighbors adjacent to us by a chain link fence.  The “back” of the back yard was an open board fence.  Beyond this fence was our barn and “pasture” area fenced with a barb wire fence.  This was where we put our chicken house, and also our milk goats.   There was a fairly large area to mow in the back yard.  
Our adjacent neighbor on the west side was an older couple (compared to us) who was a contractor.  They had a German shepherd named Rousa.  Rousa was a watch dog—a real one.  Rousa taught me one of the first and very important lessons about leadership.  As Rousa was getting older, our neighbor bought another German shepherd about one year old.   If you know about dogs, you know there is no formal designated “positional authority” as we have in our management structures, but there is definite authority.  Rousa was the “top dog”. 
 Remember that we had a chain link fence separating our back yard from our neighbors.  Rousa was not one to bark at just anything she heard or saw.  But, if you appeared to threaten her territory or appeared to encroach on it, she would definitely let you know and sound the alarm.  She never barked at us or the children when we were in our yard.  She rarely barked at all.  However, when I mowed the yard, I would sometime forget about Rousa and back up against “her” chain link fence with my back to Rousa.  I would hear nothing.  Until…….suddenly the most blood curdling and vicious bark you've ever heard would be right at my back.  You haven’t lived until you have experienced the sudden jolt of fear this engendered. 
Being a good “top dog” leader, Rousa began to train her young successor in how to conduct herself.  We began to notice Rousa actively getting the young dog to do exactly what she did.  The “proof” of this was not too long in coming.  One day I forgot again backed up to the chain link fence.  Once more, I was scared half out of my wits.  But, this time when I recovered and looked up , there was Rousa serenely sitting on our neighbors back deck just watching.  She had sent her trainee out to let us know that we shouldn’t get too close to her territory.  
What are the leadership lessons?
11)    There are “top dogs” in any “pack” of humans organized to accomplish tasks.  They may or may not have positional authority
22)    These “old bulls”  train new people to:  a) Understand their tasks in the same way they understand their tasks b) Perform whatever the tasks are in the same way that the “old bulls” do that task.
33)    That it is difficult for new people put in with “old bulls” to challenge either the tasks or how to do the tasks.  Because of the “top dog” status of these old bulls, their experience in suppressing leadership challenges, and their reluctance to “give up” long exercised authority, it is rare that change occurs.
44)    The “old bulls” are watchful that what they think are the major objectives are still the main objectives and they are still done.  They will be watching from the porch even if they delegate tasks.

Lessons for Elderships:

In a volunteer organization like a congregation, the above lessons play out more often than not.  Nearly all elderships have one or more “old bulls” that others yield to as “top dogs”.  The longer serving, however worthily, the more their opinions and ways of doing things are followed.  The very characteristics of newly appointed elders will make them reluctant to challenge the previous priorities or “the way things are done”.   Rarely will elderships put in a larger number of “new elders” than already serve.  In fact, the opposite is true.  A small number is incrementally installed so the new elders can be properly “trained,” have a smooth transition, and not disrupt the congregation.   Elders who retain charge of the eldership selection process  tend to choose “men like themselves.” This results in little change in operation from the eldership before new elders are installed.   Elderships tend to do just like Rousa, train new members to act just like they do.  The above is one major reason it is so difficult to change directions of a congregation or renew its purpose.